Search for: "Cox Communications Inc. "
Results 181 - 200
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
Cox suggests things could get even more difficult for plaintiffs. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
Cox suggests things could get even more difficult for plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
Verizon Communications Inc., No. 1:12-cv-01354. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
Verizon Communications Inc., No. 1:12-cv-01354. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
See also Legacy Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
See also Legacy Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Riverkeeper, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 1498, 2009.) [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
In relation to subrule (iv), which he referred to as “Local community interest”, he stated the following: Local community interest: The moving defendant has requested that the action be tried with a jury. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
ProPublica reports how owners or sister companies of media organisations including NBC News, ABC News, Fox News, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Politico, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and other local TV news outlets are “lobbying against a Federal Communications Commission measure to require broadcasters to post political ad data on the internet“. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
But the principles underlying the case, relating to whether all those who use mass communications technology should be accorded the same protections as ‘big’ media, nevertheless inspire trenchant views: the cudgels have now been taken up by Eugene Volokh of the Volokh conspiracy blog, who has become involved in Cox’s case on a pro bono basis, and Cox has filed a notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am
bit.ly/HzXpGZ (Joshua Engel) Communications with Unretained Experts, Unprotected by Rule 26(b)(B)(4)(C) – Any Exceptions? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Jeff Cox, Esq. of Sallah & Cox, LLC, a South Florida securities law firm gets the credit for this one. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
Sequence, Inc. is part of the solution too, by exposing the attacks on Kevin Padrick, and shining a light on Cox’s widespread extortion scheme, so is Philly Law Blog, and before any of the law blogger community jumped on the bandwagon, Salty Droid was out there all by himself, shining a little light — which is now accompanied by more and more lights. [read post]
Robinson Reviews U.S. Supreme Court Case Roberts v. Sea-Land Services and other Work Comp Happenings
19 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
©2012 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Lee, Ars Technica Randy Cadenhead, Privacy Counsel, Cox Communications Inc. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- No abuse of discretion in ordering sequestration of rents -- Lack of standing is affirmative defense to foreclosure, and trial court should refrain from conclusively ruling on affirmative defenses in ruling on motion to sequester rentsTIDEWATER ESTATES CO-OP, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, and all other unknown parties including claimants, persons or parties, natural or corporate, or whose legal status is… [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:00 pm
Attendees at this panel are eligible for 2 CLE credit in professional practice Moderator: Mercer Givhan , Associate Professor of Law, New York Law School Brian Roberts , Chief of the Community Defender Division, DC Public Defender Service Glenn Martin , Vice President of Development and Public Affairs, Fortune Society Todd Cox , Director,Office of Communications and Legislative Affairs, U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
AutoZone, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
Additionally, in light of the multiple regional analysis required to determine market power and impact, maintaining a class action would not be manageable, the court noted.The decision is In Re: Cox Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:02 am
Cox, Chairman of Cincinnati Bell's Board of Directors, "The proposed settlement includes features which will clarify the Company's executive compensation policies and which will more clearly communicate these policies to our shareholders. [read post]
