Search for: "David Marvel"
Results 181 - 200
of 427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2020, 8:56 am
It rejected the advice of Cyberlaw Podcast regular David Kris in an opinion that includes all the court’s legal reasoning but remains impenetrable because the facts are all classified. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
Meanwhile, on the PatLit blog, David Berry reports on yet another patent case that the US Supreme Court is happy to hear, Kimble v Marvel Enterprises, which will revisit the rule in Brulotte v Thys and the endearing practice of extracting royalty payments from a licensee after the patent has expired (this patent involves a Spiderman toy, if you were wondering). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:43 am
Earlier today, the IPKat mentioned the late, lamented David Bowie and a somewhat tenuous connection to patents (see Friday Fantasies). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 7:29 am
Here's a sampling of how she incorporated the Trump phenomenon into the thesis of her book (and I think she did this much better than the book's subtitle suggests):Wildcard is the name of a fictional superhero in Marvel comics. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 3:03 am
We are sure they will be finding marvellous titbits and morsels of copyright news to keep everyone well fed with up to date copyright news. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:57 pm
And our clients will have realized marvelous - even mysterious - benefits.What can you do to become contagious? [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:59 pm
Whenever I had a chance, I would press Nan to get out the most recent box, and we would we become engrossed in the latest scientific marvel. [read post]
25 Dec 2005, 4:01 pm
Available as a hard cover with dust jacket or trade paperback version, this book makes a great holiday gift for someone you love (or just like).The name and likeness of She-Hulk is a trademark of Marvel Characters, Inc., and Marvel is bringing this character back in a new series of comics, including the 25th anniversary issue, featuring outstanding new cover art that is copyright by the original artist Greg Horn and/or Marvel. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:27 pm
Here was a woman, after all, who managed to be a close friend of Tony and Cherie Blair, then a friend (perhaps less close and more briefly) of Gordon and Sarah Brown, and then a very close (‘lots of love’) friend of David and Samantha Cameron. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:58 am
I strongly recommend that everyone read the debates as collected in the marvelous The Founder's Constitution, edited by Philip Kurland and Ralph Lerner, Volume 2, 182-239, available online thanks to the Liberty Fund, which has also reprinted it in a marvelously produced (and affordable) five-volume version. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:50 am
” David Allen Green has considered the twitter issue with: On being hated by tweeters. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
[Doomsday warnings don't hold up] The debate over carrying firearms outside the home often is accompanied by predictions that public carry will lead to more violent crime. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Marvel Entertainment, LLC four years ago: “an argument that we got something wrong—even a good argument to that effect—cannot by itself justify scrapping settled precedent. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
Times article by David Segal on law schools. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 3:13 pm
Marvel sets up their heroes with gray areas. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Meanwhile, having had a marvellous turn out for our Mark Stephens event, we hope you'll now sign up with equal enthusiasm for these two:Scottish Launch of Centre for Internet Law and PolicyScottish Phonehacking Symposiumto be reschedued in 2012 due to industrial action (sigh..) [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:27 am
Reciprocal accountability — a widely shared power to shine light, even on the mighty — is the unsung marvel of our age, empowering even eccentrics and minorities to enforce their own freedom. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:15 am
Hunting Promissory Estoppel, David V Snyder11. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
" --David Oshinsky, Jack S. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:52 am
I join David Allen Green (in my case a cynical rather than ‘skeptical’ eye) in marvelling at the mainstream media hysteria on the possibility that judges and parliamentarians may bring sense to the whole privacy issue. [read post]
