Search for: "Does 1-11, inclusive"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
Such a phonogram should not therefore be classified as a copy within the meaning of Article 9(1)(b) of Directive 2006/115.Is sampling protected as German free use or as a quotation? [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
These ownership and holding period thresholds represent a departure from the June 2009 proposal, which called for scaled ownership requirements of 1%, 3% and 5% based on company size and a 1-year holding period. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
Such limitation could affect freedom of expression and information as per Article 11 of the EU Charter. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:42 am
In construing the claim, the Board found that the Applicant had read too narrowly: [C]laim 1 does not require that the executing at least one corrective action be performed by any particular unit, but merely recites executing at least one corrective action from the array of corrective actions (see claim 1). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:42 am
In construing the claim, the Board found that the Applicant had read too narrowly: [C]laim 1 does not require that the executing at least one corrective action be performed by any particular unit, but merely recites executing at least one corrective action from the array of corrective actions (see claim 1). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:43 pm
Winck, B. a. (2021, November 1). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:25 am
Rationale: Plaintiff essentially argued that Rule 11(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure only allows for three categories of materials that ought to be in the Record on Appeal: (1) evidence filed, served, and submitted for consideration, (2) evidence admitted, or (3) evidence made the subject of an offer of proof. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
I asked them how often their diversity and inclusion training addresses ageism and combating ageism, and most admitted that it almost never does. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:29 am
She visited NYU Law’s Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging on February 5, New York Law School on February 6, Columbia University on February 11, and the University of Pennsylvania and the National Constitution Center on February 12. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
It’s a summary of all appeals and leaves to appeal granted, so you know what the S.C.C. will soon be dealing with (November 12 – December 11, 2015 inclusive). [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from March 10 – April 13, 2022 inclusive. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
The Supreme Court held that it does. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:25 am
This established a firmer need to conduct the proceedings in British Columbia, but was not the only consideration contemplated by the Court, as section 11(2) of the CJPTA imposed further factors for considerations. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:17 am
2C:16-1. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
The case in question is Case C‑657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology BV v Bert Peelaers, Visys NV, a ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) which was published yesterday on a request for a preliminary ruling made by the Belgian Hof van Cassatie in December 2011 [Merpel notes that, even inclusive of the time taken to ask the Advocate General for an Opinion, and possibly even to read it, the CJEU dealt with this reference in… [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
Judge Titus noted that the EEOC's credit check data covered 1/1/05-10/13/08 while the EEOC's claims covered the period of 3/23/07-8/11/11. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:11 am
Does it not have Internet access and the ability to conduct searches? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 3:51 pm
1049/2001, and also that the information “did not relate to emissions into the environment” within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Regulation No. 1367/2006 concerning public disclosure of information on the environmental effects of glyphosate. [read post]
