Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 181 - 200
of 5,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
He received a 37-month sentence (rather than a range of 1 – 7 without enhancements). [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
According to the latest Annual Report by the Boards of Appeal, the average length of inter partes proceedings is 37 months (up 1 month from 2015), i.e. more than three years. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
See 37 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:43 am
Here’s the results from a recent survey on management representation letters: 1. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:43 am
Here’s the results from a recent survey on management representation letters: 1. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:49 am
In general, clients bring this paper work back in one of three ways: 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Inventive step[5] The decision under appeal starts from D1 and makes reference to passages on pages 1, 4 and 9. [5.1] On page 1, D1 introduces the problem of protecting ownership of digital data on the Internet. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, claim 1 does not contain any additional feature related to any implementation in a therapeutic method.The particular approach to novelty created by decision G 6/83, therefore, does not apply to claim 1 of the main request, the subject-matter of which is equivalent to a process claim, i.e. [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:30 am
Here's what the legislature's website says happened to the rest of the pro-employee bills (hint: unless it says it was presented to the Governor or the Governor signed it, it's dead):Overtime: HB 455 - Labor RegulationsGeneral Bill by CampbellLabor Regulations: Designates act as "Florida Overtime Act of 2015"; revises number of hours of labor that comprise legal day's work; revises rates of overtime compensation for labor performed in excess of certain of hours of… [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:18 am
Subsequent forgetfulness or negligence in possession does not negate otherwise-knowing possession of a controlled substance under Article 112a.Id., slip op. at 4.ACCA recommends a change to the Benchbook to reflect that statement of the law: "We specifically disapprove any implication to the contrary in Dept of the Army Pam. 27-9, Legal Services -- Military Judges' Benchbook, paragraph 3-37-1, note 3 and encourage the drafters to revise the note. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
It should be noted that, with very rare exceptions, the British ColumbiaWills Act does not recognize holograph wills as valid wills.Mr. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:53 pm
What does this mean? [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:04 am
(i) For persons under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a license to the Government resulting from a rights determination under Executive Order 10096 does not constitute a license so as to prohibit claiming small entity status. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am
§ 21 and 37 C.F.R. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
Third-Party Submissions in Patent Applications (37 C.F.R. 1.99) Protests Against Published Applications (37 C.F.R. 1.291) Citation of Prior Art in Issued Patents (37 C.F.R. 1.501) 1. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:03 am
The Canadian Adverse Events Study found that 37% of adverse events were “highly” preventable and almost 1/4 of adverse events (24%) were due to medication errors. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
ENDA: Religious Freedom and Employment Discrimination, 23 Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law 1-37 (2016).Vincent J. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
§41(c)(1), and implemented by 37 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:24 am
However, the amendment also proposes to make an order refusing reference to arbitration as an appealable order under S. 37(1)(a).This amendment has the potential to cause confusion on when a judicial authority would be prima facie satisfied and might require judicial exposition akin to Boghara Polyfab. [read post]
