Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
LEGAL UPDATE ON FLORIDA CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CONVICTIONS AND THEIR IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES-PART TWO
24 Jun 2015, 6:30 am
Also, if the offense does not involve an element of “trading or dealing,” then it also cannot be an aggravated felony. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Lisch, ––– So.3d ––––, 43 Fla. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
La Corte sostuvo que:1. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, it was held that claims 6 to 8, the features of which are now present in claims 1, 5 and 6, did not fulfil the requirements of R 43.However, the impugned decision is not based on grounds of which objections of non-compliance with A 84 and R 43 form part.[9] As already found in decision T 1640/06, objections that do not form part of the grounds for a refusal of an application, in particular objections in obiter dicta, can be meant as voluntary information to an… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Reviewed by Joanna Kozakiewicz Manager, Library Reference Services Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP In CLLR 43:1 The second edition of Family Law Litigation Handbook (Ontario) is described by the author as a handy “in your briefcase” reference source to which lawyers may refer in family court when seeking a quick answer to a question. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
" Therefore, the Board found that opposer had failed to adequately plead her non-use claim, and it granted the motion to dismiss.However, the Board allowed applicant twenty days within which to re-plead her non-use claim.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Does opposer have a claim under Section 43(a)? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:21 pm
The United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) is an independently operated judicial agency that does several things: 1. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
ARBITRATION ACT: STAY AND APPEAL ISSUES, FINAL REPORT Alberta Law Reform Institute ISBN 978-1-896078-58-8 Excerpt pp. 40-43, 43-45 2. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
43 In those circumstances, the answer to the third question is that Article 3(1)(e) of the trade marks directive must be interpreted as meaning that the grounds for refusal of registration set out in the first and third indents of that provision may not be applied in combination. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 1:27 am
[Timasani (Pty) Ltd (in business rescue) v Afrimat Iron Ore (Pty) Ltd [2021] ZASCA 43 (13 April 2021)] [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
”[1] And today, a small group of some of the world’s most powerful corporations exercise complete control over that public square. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:53 am
[Image: Car vs. motorcycle accident in Pisek, Czech Republic, February 1, 2008, by Chmee2] [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:17 am
Chris writes: 1. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
Final Written Decision at 43–44. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 1:05 am
For example Clause 43 reads as follows “43. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 7:20 am
The Unemployment Compensation Law (UCL), N.J.S.A. 43:21-1 to -71, was designed to act as a cushion “against the shocks and rigors of unemployment. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 am
Editor’s Note: this post was updated at 1:43 p.m. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
I also hope a recording of the event will be made available.My presentation: Four big things the parties and amici disagree on, and some thoughts about vagueness and inconsistency in 2(a) refusals:First: Whether 43(a)(1)(A) incorporates the same policy based limits as registration under section 2. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
"COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among Refugees in Bidibidi Refugee Settlement, Northern Uganda," Journal of Global Health Reports, vol. 6 (2022)- Authors (3) = Uganda- APC = USD 750"Development of a Simple Sustainable Camping Shelter for Addressing the Needs of Refugees in Jordan," Results in Engineering, vol. 14 (June 2022)- Authors (3) = Jordan (2, incl. lead), UAE/Jordan (1)- APC = USD 1000"The Disappearance of Refugee Rights in South… [read post]
Is a circular logo for coffee confusingly similar to the Starbucks’ one? Yes, says the General Court
28 Jan 2018, 8:05 am
Starbucks had a number of earlier EU and national marks registered, inter alia, in Class 43 of the Nice classification. [read post]
