Search for: "Does 1-51" Results 181 - 200 of 3,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Antelope, 430 U.S. 641, 643 n.1, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 1397 n.1, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977); United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This understanding of the legal situation (Rechtsauffassung), which the appellant presented in his statement of February 25, 2010 / March 1, 2010 filed as a response to the notification of the Board dated December 29, 2009, is not in harmony with R 51.It is true indeed that the renewal fess for a European patent application in respect of the coming year fall due on the last day of the month which has the same name as the month containing the date of filing of this application (R… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:02 am by Merpel McKitten
It would seem that, consequently, the Huawei framework does not apply to them. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:57 am by Christopher Wilkinson
The ban was scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2020, but the TRO put enforcement on hold for now. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Br. 11; ’072 Patent col.3, ll. 49-51, col. 15, ll. 49-50. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:00 pm by Moderator
— My Panama Lawyer (@mypanamalawyer) November 1, 2014The OECD actions take place 1 week before the November 111th celebrations of Panama's secession from Colombia, when nationalism is at its highest point.- See more at: http://www.mire.gob.pa/noticias/2014/10/30/panama-reevalua-su-estrategia-de-estado-en-materia-de-intercambio-de-informacionShare | [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:27 pm by David Oxenford
 The Commission denied reconsideration of the requirement that translators operating above channel 51 had to cease operations by the end of 2011. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 12:38 am
In view of Article 15(1)  and Article 51 EU Trade Mark Regulation, this is really the only correct answer, as David Brophy and the sole commenter H Lee already noted in the IPKat post on the referal. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:11 pm by Seeger Weiss LLP
The settlement does not constitute an admission by either side concerning the merits of the parties’ allegations and defenses. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm
Disclosure regarding material risk factors and material factors or assumptions In respect of the requirement to identify material risk factors and material factors or assumptions, (as required under section 4A.3 of NI 51-102) staff note that various issuers have either neglected to discuss the underlying factors or assumptions or stated that there were factors or assumptions without identifying them: disclosure which, in their view, does not satisfy the requirements of NI… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 1:13 pm
  It's not just that there's (1) an express split in the Court of Appeal, (2) regarding an issue that's likely to come up in numerous other cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Does this have to be a 51% likelihood, a threshold which would almost never be satisfied? [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
OPINION Santé publique France reports that as of 13/04/2022, 53 confirmed cases have been identified, of which 51 are linked to O26 strains, and 2 to O103 strains. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:09 pm by Bill Marler
Santé publique France reports that as of 13/04/2022, 53 confirmed cases have been identified, of which 51 are linked to O26 strains, and 2 to O103 strains. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:12 pm by Daniel Katzin
  [1] We also recommend that an issuer’s website does not include links to third party content, such as analysts’ reports. [read post]