Search for: "Edwards v. Super*" Results 181 - 200 of 1,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Birss J was satisfied that he had arrived at the same approach as Arnold J in Edwards v Boston, and further, that this test was “not far from the test for a compulsory licence (market demand not met)” [90]. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 10 March 2020  Nicol J heard an application in the case of Johnson v McArdle. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm by Patricia Hughes
There are plenty of the “big” constitutional cases, but I’ll refer to only one other in addition to the Secession Reference: the Persons Case (Edwards v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
Two that come to mind, for example, are Evan Thomas’s The Man To See (1992) (about Edward Bennett Williams) and Louis Nizer’s  My Life In Court (1961). [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jay J then  heard an application in the case of Wright v Granath before Jay J. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The subcommittee will hear testimony from John Brown, the assistant director of the FBI's counterintelligence division; Rebecca Keiser, the head of the office of science and engineering at the National Science Foundation; Michael Lauer, the deputy director of extramural research at the National Institutes of Health; Christopher Fall, the director of the office of science at the Department of Energy; and Edward Ramotowski, the deputy assistant secretary of state for visa services. [read post]