Search for: "F. Keller"
Results 181 - 200
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 426 (CCPA 1981) (“one cannot show non-obviousness by attacking references individually where, as here, the rejections are based on combinations of references”); see also In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:41 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:28 am
., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981)(“The test for obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may be bodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference; nor is it that the claimed invention must be expressly suggested in any one or all of the references. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:57 am
§ 6330 and concluding that the Commissioner’s decision was subject to abuse of discretion review under APA § 706(2)(A)); see also Keller v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:49 am
In re Etter, 756 F.2d 852 (Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:42 am
”Keller, 642 F.2d at 425. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:38 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 426 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:24 am
” In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:26 pm
Aeroquip Corp., 733 F.2d 881, 889 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981).Regarding Appellants’ argument that the Examiner has not shown that the claimed invention was within the level of ordinary skill in the art, we note that the references themselves establish the level of skill in the art. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981).Regarding Appellants’ argument that the Examiner has not shown that the claimed invention was within the level of ordinary skill in the art, we note that the references themselves establish the level of skill in the art. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:38 am
” In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981) (citations omitted).Here, the Examiner does not propose that the stepped face feature of Chang, be physically incorporated into the structure of Olson. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:55 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:57 am
Voici les raisons avancées par le gouvernement français pour obtenir le vote positif des députés : PROJET DE LOI autorisant l’approbation de la convention entre le Gouvernement de la République française et le Gouvernement de la République du Panama en vue d’éviter les doubles impositions et de prévenir l’évasion et la fraude fiscales en matière d’impôts sur le revenu NOR :… [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm
Bennett.Hegland, Kenney F. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:10 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
" In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:47 am
Breno selber entschuldigte sich für die Tat und zeigte Reue. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
"); In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981) ("The test for obviousness is not whether the features of a secondary reference may be bodily incorporated into the structure of the primary reference . . . . [read post]
