Search for: "Flower v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
United States, striking down the former Virginia governor’s federal corruption convictions; she argues that the ruling “broadcasts entirely the wrong message to both elected officials and the businessmen, businesswomen and their lobbyists trying to woo them into action. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Alabama, 15-7553, Flowers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:19 am
This week's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
MCL 28.211a(b) defines `nonpublic information’ as `information to which access, use, or dissemination is restricted by a law or rule of this state or the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:51 am
Flowers, 547 US 220 the United States Supreme Court held that when the government becomes aware that its attempt at notice has failed, due process requires the government to "take additional reasonable steps to attempt to provide notice to the property owner before selling his property, if it is practicable to do so. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 3:00 pm
Judge Carlos Bea United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:18 am
The court’s majority opinion pointed out crucial facts that kept the court from applying the due process rules which were set out by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, most recently in Jones v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
On Wednesday 2nd February, the UKSC will hand down judgment in R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:32 pm
United States, 398 U.S. 333, 354 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
