Search for: "Food Fair Stores v. Food Fair" Results 181 - 200 of 411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
First principle - don't buy new products of any kind (from stores, web sites, etc.)2. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Grain Farmers of Ontario: depicted farms and farmers under stress, food supply shortages, empty grocery stores: condemned as inappropriate fearmongering. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:42 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Trahan Transformation (“Trahan”), which stored the cargo with Entrepôt du Nord Cold Storage Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Its name is Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 609 and it's a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sedley LJ, Rimer LJ and Sir Scott Baker) last Wednesday, 2 June.Asda (the British embodiment of Walmart) sold its own health food products, some of which were labelled with appealing little phrases like "No hidden nasties" and "No artificial colours or flavours and no aspartame". [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hobby Lobby Stores, rejecting the birth-control mandate as it applied to closely held for-profit businesses. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A Private Duty in Pandemics, and Insurance Considerations In Adam, Abudu v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
Woodman's Food Markets Inc., a Janesville, Wisconsin-based grocery store operator, violated federal disability discrimination law by firing an employee due to her lifting restriction, EEOC charged in a lawsuit. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am by Greg Mersol
  First, the court noted that the statute virtually forced courts to “select among trifles” and rejected the view, akin to its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:54 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
I understand the Supreme Court’s and the Eleventh Circuit’s view in not allowing employees to waive claims under the FLSA (though I do think it means unnecessary and typically protracted litigation for all involved), but that is because the FLSA has Section 216(c), which provides (and as the Eleventh Circuit explained in Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]