Search for: "Ford v. Texas"
Results 181 - 200
of 469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
University of Texas at Austin, 14-981, involves an Equal Protection Clause challenge to UT’s use of race in undergraduate admissions. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
President Gerald Ford Forty-one days after the Supreme Court held argument in Runyon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Wade, and that same afternoon Lyndon Johnson died at his ranch in Texas. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Phillips Petroleum Co., 492 S.W.2d 934, 937 (Tex. 1972);Ford v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
§ 13.002(1) (West 2014); Ford v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:08 am
Oral argument was held Wednesday in EEOC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:48 pm
People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
App. 2014); Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
A decision from the Supreme Court in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144, and Berger v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:05 pm
The states affected states include Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas as well as the territories of Puerto Rico, the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
In Walker, Texas Ranger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
