Search for: "Frank v Smith"
Results 181 - 200
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
The court also dismissed the employee’s Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation claim, finding the Fifth Circuit’s reasoning in Asadi v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Kilmer, Erika Jean Pribanic-Smith, Debra Reddin van Tuyll, Janice R. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION RULES The SEC was fairly active in 2015 when it came to addressing executive compensation and hedging rules required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:20 am
Smith-Green Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
Verble v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Smith, 230 F.3d 300 (U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:32 am
But similarly to the response to the whistleblower provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, companies must now be in a stronger position to quickly and accurately assess any potential violations that might be detected, reported or arise. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
Sly, Martyn Thomas Smith, Colin L. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Montgomery v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
There are countless examples of this, but perhaps the best illustration is Cavazos v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
”) Franks v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Louis V. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 12:30 am
Dayton and Sharon V. [read post]
