Search for: "G Grant Johnson"
Results 181 - 200
of 406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 6:27 pm
Mark G. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
A natural-gas pipeline exploded in Johnson County, Texas, on June 7, 2010. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
A natural-gas pipeline exploded in Johnson County, Texas, on June 7, 2010. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:14 pm
Polin, Esq., Steven G. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
§ 922(g) to a mandatory minimum of 15 years under the ACCA. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:22 am
§1132(g). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:22 am
§1132(g). [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:04 am
By Brennen Johnson Last month, the Federal Communications Commission published its new net neutrality rules in the Federal Register. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
Don G. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm
David G. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:23 pm
The class certification order was vacated (Johnson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:28 pm
The Supreme Court granted cert (owing to a conflict among the circuits on this question of whether the prohibition on “possession” includes owner-directed transfers), and oral argument in the case (Henderson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
(a) Rebekah Brooks (b) Clive Goodman (c) Boris Johnson (d) Mr Justice Saunders (14) In what context was the following remark made-“Andy Coulson continues to endure appalling indignities in prison”? [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Edgar Hoover, Lyndon Johnson, and others. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman excerpts some of the highlights from yesterday’s per curiam decision in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Johnson, 682 F.Supp. 1033 (W.D.Mo.1988).I.BackgroundFor almost a century, the Federal Government employed in criminal cases a system of indeterminate sentencing. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). [read post]
