Search for: "Gardner v. Nation"
Results 181 - 200
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
That being said, not all cases are about celebrities: the courts have repeatedly prevented the government from keeping inconvenient information out of the public eye in the name of national security. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
The British National Party would not treat everybody in the same way under the law, and would write laws which discriminated between people on the basis of their race or colour. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
Case Law: OPQ v BJM – a privacy injunction “contra mundum” And, as always, The UK Human Rights blog has a considered and accurate view. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
In an excellent post on the Head of Legal blog, Carl Gardner suggests the following solution: allow any convicted prisoner to apply to the judge when sentenced to imprisonment to lift, in his or her case, the ban on voting in general elections to Westminster and the devolved national legislatures. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
Administrative authority is then vested in the organs of state which accept the leadership of the Party and its guidance in the governance of the nation. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Administrative authority is then vested in the organs of state which accept the leadership of the Party and its guidance in the governance of the nation. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:22 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Gardner’s death, Dr. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Gardner and Todd Maki. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision by the Nebraska Court of Appeals in Ewing v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:25 pm
Narrated by Neil Gardner. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
International jurisdiction for actions against third-country defendants as brought before EU Member State courts is – with only few exceptions – generally governed by the national provisions of the respective Member State whose courts [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
City of New London1 has brought eminent domain issues into the national spotlight. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
It reached RollOnFriday by Wednesday, and by Thursday morning the story was all over the national newspapers. [read post]
