Search for: "Generes v. Campbell"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,355
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
Campbell v Dugdale [2020] CSIH 27 A case in First Division, Inner House of the Court of Session. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
Cheaper secret santa friendly versions are also available.3 - No love and affection for XOXO (Global Brand Holdings v EUIPO, EU General Court, Case T‑503/19 (May 2020))To me, the mark XOXO means nothing at all. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
This sort of heckler's veto is inconsistent with Georgia law, which generally does not hold businesses liable for behavior of third parties that it cannot control, and which generally requires a showing that a nuisance was proximately caused by defendants rather than by the supervening acts of third parties. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
These are general propositions going far beyond the mere protection of reputations. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 3:43 pm
Campbell’s expression raised no general concerns about the importance of lawyers respecting their undertakings, nor was it directed to anyone with an interest in the respondents’ conduct. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:16 am
Campbell is solicitor general of the state of Nebraska. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:17 am
It also provides a useful guide on plausibility and comments on Warner-Lambert v Generics regarding plausibility and infringement of second medical use patents.The book comprises 24 chapters, and comprehensively covers each stage of the patent life - from application to infringement. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
Her analysis focused on the foundation of Lord Bannatyne’s reasoning, the case of Campbell v MGN Ltd. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 10:59 am
See Campbell, supra, at 255–56, 284. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
Generally, where a penal statute imposes strict liability for creating an unintended result, an attempt to commit that crime is not a legally cognizable offense (see, People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm
Campbell (Neb. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:12 pm
Campbell, ___ N.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:55 am
However, the courts in Campbell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:49 am
Campbell, 78 So.3d 595, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). [read post]
