Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 181 - 200 of 67,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 7:03 am by Glenn Neiman
In this matter, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry, Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:03 am by Glenn Neiman
In this matter, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry, Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Lack of prior misconduct not sufficient to mitigate imposing the penalty of dismissal given the fraudulent nature of the individual’s misconductRonga v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 02921, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn an earlier decision, Ronga v New York City Department of Education, 114 AD3d 527, the Appellate Division sustained the findings of the Disciplinary Hearing Officer that Ronga, a probationary principal at a New York City public… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:20 am
Employee terminated after refusing to sign a statement acknowledging a “verbal warning” given to her by her supervisorMatter of Rey-Calderon v Commissioner of Labor, 60 AD3d 1124Wanda Rey-Calderon, a school bus dispatcher, for the employer reported late to work and her supervisor gave her a verbal warning and a written acknowledgment of the verbal warning for her to sign. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Ari Ezra Waldman
He made various arguments, but his appeal was given an enormous boost by the 2015 New Jersey Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
  The court also sought to deter the plaintiff from similar litigation tactics, given the plaintiff's pattern of litigation.The Sixth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:06 am
  Although it is generally  a futile effort to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on any given issue, my reading of the KSR v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:57 am by sally
Miah and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261; [2012] WLR (D) 68 “There was no ‘near-miss’ principle in relation to immigration policy such that there was no presumption that those falling just outside the policy should be treated as though they were within it or given special consideration for that reason.” WLR Daily, 7th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:05 am by sally
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury Court of Appeal “Where, in civil proceedings in which a litigant’s rights to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights applied, irreducible minimum rights were required to be accorded the litigant to be given sufficient information of the evidential case against him, to enable him to give effective instructions concerning the essential allegations against him. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:24 am by sally
Link Financial Ltd v Jones [2012] EWHC 2402 (QB); [2012] WLR (D) 251 “A legal assignee of the debt due under a regulated consumer credit agreement which had given notice of the assignment to the debtor was a “creditor” within the meaning of section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and entitled to bring proceedings to recover the debt.” WLR Daily, 22nd August 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:08 am
Raja v Van Hoogstraten (No 9) Court of Appeal “Since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules, applications for the setting aside of orders made without notice were governed by rule 23.10, and determined by the court exercising the discretion given by that rule in accordance with the overriding objective to do justice. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:28 am
Banks v Kingston upon Thames Royal Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1443; [2008] WLR (D) 397 “A purposive interpretation should be given to reg 8(2) of the Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999 to ensure that, where a reviewing officer was minded to confirm a decision on different grounds, the applicant should be [...] [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:39 pm
The link to the transcript for the November 9th oral arguments before the SCOTUS in Bilski v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:13 am by John Steele
Given the demise of Dewey and similar events, I'm pleased to upload this article by Kevin Rosen of Gibson Dunn, published by Beazley, about California's leading case (Jewel v. [read post]