Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 181 - 200 of 75,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
We reported yesterday that the Supreme Court has given Times Newspapers permission to appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal in Flood v Times Newspapers ([2010] EWCA Civ 804). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:37 pm by Dwight Sullivan
District Court for the Southern District of  California has given the federal defendants an extension of time until 17 December to respond to the complaint. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Lack of prior misconduct not sufficient to mitigate imposing the penalty of dismissal given the fraudulent nature of the individual’s misconductRonga v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 02921, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn an earlier decision, Ronga v New York City Department of Education, 114 AD3d 527, the Appellate Division sustained the findings of the Disciplinary Hearing Officer that Ronga, a probationary principal at a New York City public… [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:03 am by Glenn Neiman
In this matter, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry, Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:03 am by Glenn Neiman
In this matter, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry, Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:20 am
Employee terminated after refusing to sign a statement acknowledging a “verbal warning” given to her by her supervisorMatter of Rey-Calderon v Commissioner of Labor, 60 AD3d 1124Wanda Rey-Calderon, a school bus dispatcher, for the employer reported late to work and her supervisor gave her a verbal warning and a written acknowledgment of the verbal warning for her to sign. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Ari Ezra Waldman
He made various arguments, but his appeal was given an enormous boost by the 2015 New Jersey Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:06 am
  Although it is generally  a futile effort to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on any given issue, my reading of the KSR v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:39 pm
The link to the transcript for the November 9th oral arguments before the SCOTUS in Bilski v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:08 am
Raja v Van Hoogstraten (No 9) Court of Appeal “Since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules, applications for the setting aside of orders made without notice were governed by rule 23.10, and determined by the court exercising the discretion given by that rule in accordance with the overriding objective to do justice. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:57 am by sally
Miah and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261; [2012] WLR (D) 68 “There was no ‘near-miss’ principle in relation to immigration policy such that there was no presumption that those falling just outside the policy should be treated as though they were within it or given special consideration for that reason.” WLR Daily, 7th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]