Search for: "Givens v. Smith et al" Results 181 - 200 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
FORRESTER WINNE, et al., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In 1982, the Supreme Court again addressed and advanced solicitor-client privilege in Descôteaux et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
According to Molan’s statement of claim, she never said her comment was an “in-joke”, did not refuse to apologise, and was not given sufficient opportunity to respond. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
”186 Walsh’s observation is given particular significance when considered in light of the nexus of contracts theory described in Part II.A, which posits that the law generally should provide default rules for which the parties would bargain if they could do so costlessly.187 Walsh’s dictum, therefore, suggests shareholders would bargain for rules allowing a target’s board of directors to function as a gatekeeper even with respect to unsolicited tender offers. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by jonathanturley
– ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT) COUNT V Negligent Training (Capitol Police, Capitol Police Board, et al. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
We will further consider your failure to inform you’re assured of the within offer to settle as evidence of bad faith under the recent case of Smith, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
 The phenomena observed by Sauter et. al by no means constitute the first instance of HUS induction by Shiga toxin alone. [read post]