Search for: "Goings v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 52,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
"); Townley v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
Several news outlets have reports on Marder v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Munoz v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
Many defendants focus exclusively on only one issue in their case – Am I going to jail? [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:55 am
In an opinion issued last week, Dawkins v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
In Bacchus Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Indeed, it inexplicably chose to leave the focus of the Lanham Act undecided rather than going so far as to state that the focus is the conduct of using a mark in commerce, as had been urged by Abitron. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:42 pm
Read More > The post California v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:53 am
’ [21] Should the ‘special features’ approach be abandoned going forward, it is difficult to see how Judge Bonello’s suggested approach would not be reasonable. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
Google trial in the District of Columbia will go ahead.That case has already impacted the California app store case because of the information the three dozen state AGs obtained through discovery in the D.C. case.Google has moved for summary judgment against the DOJ and the state AGs, who have meanwhile filed their opposition briefs, which are sealed for the time being. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:09 pm
As a result, no state is going to ban interracial marriage, so no case will come to SCOTUS. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:05 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
The AG’s hypothetical complaint would have been based on the state DTPA, so a four part test from Singh v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 5:30 am
In Lippman v. [read post]
