Search for: "Graham v. Waters" Results 181 - 200 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
  For example, those two Justices dissented to argue in Graham v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
In a 5-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that where Xerox’s pension plan provisions gave the plan administrator the power to construe disputed terms, a federal district court should have deferred to the administrator’s reasonable interpretation of the disputed provisions (April 21, 2010).Graham County Soil and Water Conservation Dist v US ex rel Wilson (Dkt No 08-304). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Moore, University of Washington – Department of Philosophy, January 13, 2012 ’30 Years on: The Review of the Council of Europe Data Protection Convention 108′, Sylvia Kierkegaard, Nigel Waters, Graham Greenleaf, Lee A. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Great volumes of water may be harmful, greater volumes or an extended absence of water can be lethal; moderate amounts of water, however, are healthful. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
------- Title: Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Mike Dawson, "Judge to consider whether Cynthia Baldwin represented Penn State or Graham Spanier in Sandusky case,"supra.But a functional approach  might suggest a more nuanced analysis. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
” At The Narrowest Grounds, Asher Steinberg looks at Kavanaugh’s dissent in Garza v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Judge Graham also required Corn Plus to implement an Environmental Compliance Plan and a Code of Conduct as well as retain a full-time Environmental Health and Safety manager. . [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
City of Los Angeles Dep’t of Water and Power v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Addressing  in the first instance what is meant by the phrase “public disclosure” pursuant to the False Claims Act, the appeals court adopted the approach held by the majority of circuits—that “disclosure” means being affirmatively revealed to the public at large—and eschewed the Seventh Circuit’s narrower interpretation, put to ill use by the district court below (U.S. ex rel Wilson v Graham County Soil and Water Conservation… [read post]