Search for: "Grant et al v. The New York Times Company et al" Results 181 - 200 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2013, 6:02 pm by Douglas J. Wood
The New York Times Company, et al., in which the court granted Summary Judgment in favor of the defendants. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook  318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am by Max Mallory
 The firm also represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in FTC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am by Marissa Miller
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Ron Coleman
I know, for some business reasons it was advisable to split the company, there was (and is) a lot of goodwill in the mark, not granting a license would have significantly impaired the success of the new business, they couldn’t put too many restrictions on the new company’s use of the mark or it would reduce the value of the new company, and on and on. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:12 am by Melissa Jacoby
The decision grants summary judgment in Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Company v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:30 am
[1] The case is captioned Sykes v Mel Harris and Associates, LLC, et al., US Dist Ct SDNY 09-Civ 8486, Chin, J., September 4, 2012, and the opinion is currently available on Westlaw at 2012 WL 3834802 and in the New York Law Journal here [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by Don Cruse
Opinion (Lehrmann): PDF Reddy Partnership/5900 North Freeway LP and Reddy Partnership, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
For the record, Macmillan did not conspire with other publishers in New York City restaurants. [read post]