Search for: "Grant v. Arkansas Supreme Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
Because courts have disagreed on this question, the categorical approach now requires the Supreme Court to examine the burglary statute in each state. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the following cases for the upcoming term. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
Applying a broad definition, 13 of the 38 cases in which the Supreme Court has granted review for the upcoming October 2018 term raise criminal law and related issues. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
Because the process is relatively burdensome, however, the Court does not always grant review. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:51 am
In 2016, the Arkansas Supreme Court’ held in Gerber Prods. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
They were also approved by the Colorado Territorial Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
As explicated by the Supreme Court cases District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
The sharp turn against immigrants stems from a 1997 Supreme Court decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:31 am
We need the Federal Circuit to apply the Supreme Court’s decision in KSR v Teleflex more faithfully and allow the Patent Office to use common sense when faced with mundane claims. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
Smith, which was decided after Obergefell.2 Professor Joslin notes that, “In June 2017, the Supreme Court held in Pavan that Arkansas’s refusal to list a woman on the birth certificate of a child born to her same-sex spouse was inconsistent with its prior declaration in Obergefell. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
Smith, which was decided after Obergefell.2 Professor Joslin notes that, “In June 2017, the Supreme Court held in Pavan that Arkansas’s refusal to list a woman on the birth certificate of a child born to her same-sex spouse was inconsistent with its prior declaration in Obergefell. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Leah Litman weighs in on Tuesday’s cert denial in Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
The justices also dismissed as improvidently granted City of Hays v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:24 am
Their explicit aim is to have the Supreme Court take a new look at Roe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
However, given that the Bud Anderson decision presents not one but two issues of first impression, it would not be surprising if the case were to ultimately end up before the Arkansas Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 pm
Both parties cited case law from other states in support of their positions, but the trial court ultimately found the Legion’s arguments to be more persuasive, and the Arkansas Supreme Court agreed on appeal. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:44 pm
One legal issue is addressed in footnote 1:Following the district court’s grant of summaryjudgment, the Supreme Court issued its decision in SCAHygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
