Search for: "Hale v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:56 pm
CLMS exported the device to the United States, where it was distributed by defendant Uroplasty. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
(ii) Does such a person in any event remain subject to the legislation of the UK in the light of Point 19(c) of the United Kingdom’s annex VI to the Regulation? [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
Also see R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16, at paras 105-106 [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:54 am
Lord Hale stated the appellant was clearly entitled to a declaration that the application of the settlement criterion breached her rights under art 14 and A2P1 of the convention. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
The decision of the ECtHR in MGN v United Kingdom, which held that the AJA scheme was incompatible with article 10 of the Convention, concerned the balancing of the rights guaranteed by article 10 with article 6 rights. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
In the aftermath of the Cuban missile crisis, the United States identified Diego Garcia as a suitable location for a military base in the Indian Ocean. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
United States 14-510Issue: Whether the D.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:47 am
United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:14 am
In giving the only judgment Lady Hale stated that no enquiries were made to assess the practicability of moving the family to Bletchley or as to the children’s needs, subject to the Children’s Act 2004, s 11(2). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
See Hale v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
