Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 64,552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Businesses would just have to trust her and her judgment. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm by James W. Ward
Louis Police Department, stating that Muldrow failed to show a “significant” change in working conditions producing a “material employment disadvantage” because she experienced no change in her salary, rank or benefits; she retained a supervisory role, like her last position; and she presented no evidence that the transfer harmed her future career prospects. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
”In Balderas, the employee alleged that she was “not suing in her individual capacity” but “solely under the PAGA, on behalf of the State of California for all aggrieved employees. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am by Larry
In a discussion on the interpretation of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, Judge Restani mentioned her recent decision in Blue Sky the Color of Imagination, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:10 pm by Urooba Abid
In her statement, Justice Sotomayor explains that, in 2023, shortly after the Fifth Circuit’s decision, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Counterman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Court next rejected the accountant’s argument that Ellen was incapable of stating viable negligence and aiding and abetting claims because the Diner’s financial statements, had she read them, would have fully disclosed the fraud to her. [read post]