Search for: "Hill v. District of Columbia"
Results 181 - 200
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
District of ColumbiaInformal interviews are allowed in the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
Sebelius et al, was originally filed in the District Of Columbia District Court by twelve plaintiffs, comprised of individuals and companies (“et al” is Latin for “and others”). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
In City of Austin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
§ 194, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia has the “duty [] to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
The plaintiffs have appealed to the California Court of Appeal Columbia Physical Therapy v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Bias and confounding must be considered, along with other Bradford Hill factors. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, having been nominated less than two years earlier by Bush. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Jan. 12, 1987), federal district courts held that the rule precluded pharmacist liability. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Center Great Plains Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center University of Missouri/Columbia 100 Corporate Lake Drive Columbia, MO 65203 Phone: (573) 882-3600 (V/TTY); (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: ada@missouri.edu Web: http://www.adaproject.org ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY Technology-Related Assistance Missouri Assistive Technology 4731 South Cochise, Suite 114 Independence, MO 64055-6975 Phone: (816) 373-5193; (800) 647-8557(Toll Free) Fax:… [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement this week and three rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 20525-17 Sutcliffe v dailypost.co.uk 20614-17 Walker v mirror.co.uk: No breach of Principle 1 – Accuracy 20385-17 Hill v express.co.uk: Breach of Principle 1 – Accuracy 19719-17 Thomson v Sunday Post: Breach of Principle 1… [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
V. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Thereafter, he studied and taught at Columbia University Law School while earning an LL.M. degree. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
In other Court action, forty-eight states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in Snyder v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
”[6] What about Plessey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Halbrook's book will be central to the Supreme Court case, just as Halbrook's previous work was for the Supreme Court's decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
