Search for: "IN RE HENRY C." Results 181 - 200 of 502
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
As usual in these cases, I turned to our good friend (and P&C guru) Bill M. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Deborah Lawson A Grey Area Between Palliative Sedation and EuthanasiaVeerle van de Wetering An International Perspective on Patient Preferences in the Decision-Making of Continuous Sedation Until DeathAgnes van der Heide The Evolving Role of Palliative Sedation in the Era of MAiDBlair Henry Carter vs. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am by Liisa Speaker
Henry v Detroit, 234 Mich App 405, 410; 594 NW2d 107 (1999). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [That is a very Henry Smith-/numerus clausus-sounding justification.] [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am by Christine Corcos
Henry Winkler as the husband in a docudrama about a pregnant woman in a coma; Patty Duke plays the judge.The Accused (1988). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Henry Winkler as the husband in a docudrama about a pregnant woman in a coma; Patty Duke plays the judge.The Accused (1988). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Transportation Agency in 1987, Scalia quoted Shakespeare, using an exchange from Henry IV to speak about “spirits from the vasty deep. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
The judge, Henry Carr has slightly loftier Titanic quotations to offer in his judgment at [11]. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:59 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The fellow committed what otherwise would have been a Class C misdemeanor theft so he could give his kids a modest Christmas, and "To love another person is to see the face of God. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment Family Court Judgment published to promote children’s interests, in spite of likely identification of those children: Re X (3) [2016] EWFC B91 (12 October 2016) is a recently published family court judgment on disagreements about child arrangements between separated parents. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:56 pm by Schachtman
Haack proceeds to criticize Judge Kozinski for his “extraordinary argument” that “(a) equates degrees of proof with statistical probabilities; (b) assesses each expert’s testimony individually; and (c) raises the standard of admissibility under the relevance prong to the standard of proof. [read post]