Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: E. B., A CHILD" Results 181 - 200 of 1,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2022, 7:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The new complaint is also interesting to me in the context of the current focus on ESG issues. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:18 am by Russell Knight
“[E]xpenses for the following goods and services have been found to be family expenses: (1) hospital, medical and funeral expenses of a spouse or child; (2) utility bills; (3) clothing and wearing apparel expenses); (4) some; (5) carpeting for the house; (6) rent of family apartment; and (7) wages of a domestic servant. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:15 pm by Mills & Mills LLP
  As stated above, the primary consideration in parenting disputes is determining what is in the best interests of a child/children. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Merely "[b]eing in a state of nudity" is not ordinarily expressive conduct entitled to First Amendment protection. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
  If a non-fetal death occurred—that of the mother, or of the child if briefly born alive—you could be guilty of murder. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
Tornillo (what it correctly calls the “pathmarking” case), PG&E, Turner, and Hurley: Social-media platforms’ content-moderation decisions are, we think, closely analogous to the editorial judgments that the Supreme Court recognized in Miami Herald, Pacific Gas, Turner, and Hurley. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Penal Code § 43.262 [governing "Possession or Promotion of Lewd Visual Material Depicting Child" -EV]. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
But the Supreme Court itself, in cases where women or ethnic minority group members have challenged facially neutral criteria on the ground their use is motivated by impermissible gender or racial bias, might be seen to have drawn (rightly or wrongly) a distinction between a government desire to help Group A and a desire to harm Group B, even if assisting Group A would necessarily involve less success for Group B. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The Society has a duty to protect the public interest. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am by Michael
The Holley factors are: (A) the desires of the child(ren); (B) the emotional and physical needs of the child(ren) now and in the future; (C) the emotional and physical danger to the child(ren) now and in the future; (D) the parental abilities of the individuals seeking custody; (E) the programs available to assist these individuals to promote the best interest of the child(ren); (F) the plans for the child(ren) by these… [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am by Michael
The Holley factors are: (A) the desires of the child(ren); (B) the emotional and physical needs of the child(ren) now and in the future; (C) the emotional and physical danger to the child(ren) now and in the future; (D) the parental abilities of the individuals seeking custody; (E) the programs available to assist these individuals to promote the best interest of the child(ren); (F) the plans for the child(ren) by these… [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:22 am by Eugene Volokh
At this point in the conversation, Arbogast texted that he reread Brandi's first e-mails and told her that he had not had sex with children and was interested in her. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
A case involving relatively minor abuse would likely not pose a grave risk to the child nor place the child in an intolerable situation.. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:49 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/505(a)(3.5) When deviating from guidelines child support, Illinois divorce and parentage courts must focus on “the best interest of the child in light of the evidence, including, but not limited to, one or more of the following relevant factors: (a) the financial resources and needs of the child; (b) the financial resources and needs of the custodial parent; (c) the standard of living the child would have… [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by familoo
Also more honoured in the breach, particularly in terms of the 10 day timescales, is the subsequent rule (25.10) on written questions : 25.10 Written questions to experts (1) A party may put written questions about an expert’s report to (a) an expert instructed by another party; or (b) a single joint expert appointed under rule 25.11. (2) Unless the court directs otherwise or a practice direction provides otherwise, written questions under paragraph (1) – (a) must be… [read post]