Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF L. B., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 181 - 196
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
The Bundesverfassungsgericht, the German Federal Constitutional Court, established that all private law should comply with the objective order of values protected by the Constitution (BVerfGE 7, 198, Lüth). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
Hunter, Lewis B. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
DAVID L. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
L. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
Terrie has a B. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Family Court Act § 846 states in pertinent part that petitioner who has obtained a lawful order of protection of Family Court, may [162 Misc.2d 27] petition Family Court for enforcement of that order “requiring the respondent to show cause why respondent should not be dealt with in accordance with section eight hundred forty-six-a of this part” ( § 846[b]. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Moritz Bälz: Japan’s Accession to the CISG – the English abstract reads as follows: On 1 July 2008 Japan, as the 71st state, acceded to the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
It is well settled that the paramount concern in a custody proceeding arising out of a parental dispute is "the best interest of the child[ren], and what will best promote the child[ren's] welfare and happiness" (Eschbach v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
Acts present in each part or the second of this article, committed: b) using mass media or information and telecommunication networks, including the Internet; shall be punishable by deprivation of liberty for a term of two to six years, with or without deprivation of liberty for a term of up to fifteen years. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
The rules in civil (non family, non crime) proceedings, which are heard in public, are slightly different – for those interested see CPR PD 39A. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:18 am
I come from a family of entrepreneurs – a self-made mother who has never worked for anyone. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
Bukovsky was charged last year with child pornography offences and in August he took the step of suing the Crown Prosecution Service for libel. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Rothman, Sander Greenland, and Tim L. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
The Case Against The Death Penaltyby Hugo Adam Bedau --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ContentsPrefaceIntroductionDeterrenceUnfairnessInevitability of ErrorBarbarityRetributionFinancial CostsPublic OpinionAbolition TrendsFor Further Information & ReferenceNotes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------PrefaceHugo Adam Bedau is Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University. [read post]
