Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 181 - 200 of 8,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2009, 5:50 am
P. 4(b)(1)(B)(i), herebyappeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the Order GrantingDefendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment (Docket Entry192) entered in the above entitled matter on December 22, 2008.DATED this 7th day of January, 2009.Respectfully submitted,MATTHEW W. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction of any diluting stimuli causes dilution w/r/t all marks; they didn’t notice this super-dilution result from surprise w/Mercedes toothpaste b/c they didn’t test for it. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  As a matter of theory they aren’t different. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As usual, I have to skip a lot of interesting presentations and I try to attend things I haven’t seen, no matter how good the ones I have already seen/read drafts of are.Session 1: Trademarks Jason George (and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette), Trademarks as Innovation IncentivesNot saying that the goal is/should be innovation. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Fame for dilution is either/or, while confusion is a matter of degree. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If you just want the copy, it might not matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As most readers of this blog will be aware of, G 1/93 made the following statement:A feature which has not been disclosed in the application as filed but which has been added to the application during examination and which, without providing a technical contribution to the subject-matter of the claimed invention, merely limits the protection conferred by the patent as granted by excluding protection for part of the subject-matter of the claimed invention as covered by the… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Her focus: protectable subject matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:28 pm
  I seem to be in the minority in believing that the Georgia ruling just doesn't matter that much. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am by Guido Paola
A claim can cover much more than what it discloses, thus also embodiments which are not originally disclosed, but this is irrelevant for the evaluation of added subject matter. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am by Guido Paola
A claim can cover much more than what it discloses, thus also embodiments which are not originally disclosed, but this is irrelevant for the evaluation of added subject matter. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:52 pm by Ilya Somin
Perhaps such ignorance is not a problem, because the vice presidency doesn’t matter much. [read post]