Search for: "ITS SERVICES, INC v. USA"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2020, 8:43 pm
This case was thought to be of great significance by many commentators because it could open the door for enforcement of arbitral awards issued by foreign institution with seat of proceeding in China, and demonstrates the opening-up trend for foreign legal service. [1]Brentwood Industries Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
(collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for case-ending sanctions against Defendants H&H Wholesale Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
(collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for case-ending sanctions against Defendants H&H Wholesale Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
(collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for case-ending sanctions against Defendants H&H Wholesale Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
AT&T Services, Inc., No. 20-68. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:08 am
By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in New Balance Athletics, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
(See ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 1:05 pm
Nestle USA v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
In Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
LUPETTO, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:38 pm
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court released its decision in the much-anticipated Synthes USA HQ Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
******************* USA data breach class actions are commonplace. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
” Opryland USA Inc., 23 USPQ2d at 1475 (quoting Celotex v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
The amosite supplier was in South Africa and judgment proof, but the plaintiff’s lawyer was able to sue Carey-Canada, Inc., a Canadian chrysotile mining company for its supply to the factory. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:50 pm
The petitions of the week are below the jump: Malwarebytes Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Relevantly, clause 23 included the following: ‘23.1 A party must not commence court proceedings in respect of a dispute arising out of this agreement (“Dispute”), including without limitation a dispute regarding any breach or purported breach of this agreement, interpretation of any of its provisions, any matters concerning of parties’ performance or observance of its obligations under this agreement, or the termination or the right of a party to… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
Thus, Judge Anderson intensely focuses upon the following Capital One/Mandiant engagement timeline: November 30, 2015: Capital One enters into a master services agreement (“MSA”) with FireEye, Inc. and Mandiant, and thereafter enters into periodic statements of work (“SOW”) and purchase orders with Mandiant pursuant to the MSA. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Retrobrands USA LLC v. [read post]
