Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness" Results 181 - 200 of 331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 11:34 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1749 (2014) and Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Docket No. 12-1184; Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on April 29, 2014. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:46 pm by James Yang
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., (S.Ct. 2014), an exceptional case in which the court may, in its discretion, award attorney’s fees is simply one that “stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Steven Boutwell
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm by LTA-Editor
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., Octane had been sued by ICON for infringing on ICON’s patent for adjustable elliptical machines. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:54 am by JDonch
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:21 am by Gene Quinn
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., was the primary decision because the Court explained that the ruling formed the basis of their decision in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:53 am by Kristen Osenga
ICON Health & Fitness, the Supreme Court stated that there is no rigid test for determining "exceptional cases. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. broadened the “exceptional case” rubric used to determine when an award of attorney fees is appropriate in a district court patent dispute. [read post]