Search for: "In Interest of Potter" Results 181 - 200 of 1,030
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2018, 6:12 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Several podcasts I want to listen to soon may also interest Grits readers:Coercive Plea Bargaining: From the Cato InstituteRethinking Prisons, Police, and Overcriminalization: From The FederalistProsecutorial Immunity: From the Federalist SocietyStaining the System: On blood spatter analysisOff topic funSomehow, when the fan fiction, Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality first came out in serial fashion, chapter by chapter, I got turned onto it and enjoyed it immensely. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 11:56 am by Adam Feldman
By utterance we also see that although Justice Samuel Alito took a similar number of talking turns on average as Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, he was well behind Justice Potter Stewart in this category. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:13 am by Broc Romanek
That “conflicts” law was on the books before the letters were issued – see this ’03 adopting release (in particular, see the section about resolving conflicts of interest). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
 Four years later Potter Stewart took the same approach to the segregationist senators. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
You can’t sell copies of Harry Potter but you can write your own story about a child wizard that goes to a magic school. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:00 pm by Milena Sterio
 Thus, to claim that the ICC somehow wields Harry Potter-like powers which transcend any accountability is simply false. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Potter Stewart’s 1959 confirmation hearing is a case in point. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
There are some areas of book publishing in which it is acceptable to claim that it’s all about gambling and laying bets on winning and, by implication, the risk of failure; the Harry Potter franchise is a most successful example of this. [read post]
Before joining FedEx, she held the position of associate with the law firm of Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, and worked in-house with The Vanguard Group and the City of Philadelphia as counsel to its Board of Pensions and Retirement. [read post]
Before joining FedEx, she held the position of associate with the law firm of Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, and worked in-house with The Vanguard Group and the City of Philadelphia as counsel to its Board of Pensions and Retirement. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 10:06 am by Jody Simon
” The reference to revenge porn is particularly interesting, since this has emerged recently as a hot topic in the law. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 2:33 pm
“One of the things that makes him one of the greatest biographers of all time is he’ll write about Lyndon Johnson, but when he encounters another character who’s interesting — Coke Stevenson — he will drop everything and go down deep, incredibly deep, into, ‘Who is this man really? [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 3:27 pm by familoo
One is of particular interest – a guidance note about adoption celebrations. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0 ], via Wikimedia CommonsYesterday, I blogged here about the most important employment law decision of 2018. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
By Chris Potter (Flickr: 3D Judges Gavel) [CC BY 2.0 ], via Wikimedia CommonsYesterday, I blogged here about the most important employment law decision of 2018. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
” Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in Abood failed to subject the infringement of the objecting teachers’ First Amendment rights to strict scrutiny. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by Scott Bomboy
State and local governments that thought fair-share provisions furthered their interests will need to find new ways of managing their workforces. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:58 am by Matthew Dresden
If they weren’t offering copies of copyrighted works, nobody would be interested. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
 The Justice Department argues Congress clearly has granted any President powers to exclude aliens if he deems that action is needed to protect U.S. interests. [read post]