Search for: "In Matter of Wright (r. Don)*"
Results 181 - 200
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
In just a matter of minutes, it was as though "l'affaire E.S.V. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Except that some lower courts don’t seem to understand it. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
I would never be one to say that law schools get everything right when it comes to pedagogical matters, but blind grading is one area where I think that others could learn from our example. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
So if the data the Asian groups allege is backed up (and I repeat that I don’t know whether it is, but that should be the key question), then it would seem that the universities in question have been guilty of Asian stereotyping or, worse still, animus against Asians, neither of which should play any part in a legitimate affirmative action regime. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In my last column, Part One of this series, I examined a lawsuit challenging the Arizona state law scheme for holding a replacement election to fill the US Senate vacancy created by John McCain’s death last year. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
We don’t create a class of outcasts preemptively precluded from seeking the protection of the law. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
It’s quite possible that the Chief (and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, for that matter) would continue to uphold the Roe/Casey-based constitutional right to obtain a pre-viability abortion if someone has the resources and resolve to travel (even, where needed, to another state) to where such an abortion is available. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Professor Mila Sohoni is the author of a string of significant articles on administrative law, and two of her forthcoming articles are about national injunctions. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
It should also be obvious that, in an operation as far-flung as the federal government, deciding what the precise contours of particular appropriations laws are—and whether the executive branch’s expenditures fall within them—can be very complicated and statute-specific business.When the case goes up the appellate ladder, these questions may consume a great deal of time and attention, but only if the higher courts first agree with the district court on a threshold… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
That was something that I started focusing on from day one and the way you achieve that as a matter of leadership is by doing several things that will seem very straight forward. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:23 am
George Wright reports for BBC News. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
It is not inherently problematic (constitutionally or legally speaking) for a President to take a firm, even dominant, hand in overseeing, limiting, or, for that matter, terminating federal criminal investigations; if President Trump had terminated any DOJ investigation of Hillary Clinton that was still ongoing when he took office in the name of national healing, no one would think that improper. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
But, again, I don’t [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
., litigation in which neither party is a government entity] if the statute is silent on the matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court has explained, this doctrine “recognizes that only one State should have the authority to regulate a corporation’s internal affairs—matters peculiar to the relationships among or between the corporation and its current officers, directors, and shareholders—because otherwise a corporation could be faced with conflicting demands. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
The UC has fixed costs (physical plant, tenured faculty, etc.) that it must pay no matter what, and variable costs (relating to non-tenured faculty and staff, utility expenses, healthcare and security obligations, insurance, etc.) that increase as the number of enrolled students rises. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
They described how, today, administrative agencies “as a practical matter . . . exercise legislative power, . . . executive power . . . and judicial power. . . [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (which handles federal intellectual property matters) struck down the statute on its face as violating the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
If that doesn't work, then the Commission will hold a formal hearing on the matter, aft [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
” (Wright v. [read post]
