Search for: "In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 181 - 200
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 a few weeks ago, in Walker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
" Supreme Court of Florida, July 31, 2008 & [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
Davi, No. 05-20803 An order enjoining California and Florida from applying their licensing and regulatory requirements on a Texas-based real estate broker is reversed and dismissed where: 1) personal jurisdiction over California did not arise from merely having sent cease and desist orders to the Texas Real Estate Commission; and 2) personal jurisdiction over Florida did not arise from the state's contact with the Texas Attorney General's Office in order to obtain… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Ciavarella[17] pulls no punches: With utter disdain for the rule of law, defendants Mark A. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
The second was the vulnerability of the Cuban state at the beginning of its 2030 Economic Plan which relies on quite well managed foreign investment and a cautious effort to re-enter global financial and commercial markets. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
But the rules on MPs’ travel could be about to change. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Kozlowski, 80 N.J. 378(1979); In re: Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381 (2002); Devaney v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:41 pm
In sum, Price’s First Amendment interest weighs heavily against a p [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Ft. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
In re W.B. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm
In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that the rule was “likely unlawful for at least three reasons,” stating that it conflicted with the asylum statute, failed to comply with rulemaking procedures, and was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:12 am
The court also granted Apple's motion to strike the class allegations, citing its authority under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1)(A), 23(d)(1)(D), and 12(f). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:30 pm
Does the rule allow a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm
First, there’s Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which allows a “person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of property [to] move for the property's return. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
The Florida Med. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The DC Court noted that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) provides an interested person with the right to petition for issuance, amendment or repeal of a rule and, if the SEC were to deny the petition, the unsuccessful petitioner could seek review of that decision in the court of appeals after a First Amendment argument has been squarely made to the SEC; “they are not required to violate the regulation and risk prosecution to test their… [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
The two justices advised the parties that “consideration of the petition for certiorari will be deferred for an additional period of time” to “allow the Court of Appeals or the District Court to consider whether to recall the mandate, entertain a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion to vacate the earlier judgment, or provide any other available relief in light of this Court’s decision in Merit Management Group, LP v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Spencer, No. 07-40593 "A decision amending a 1995 judgment sentencing defendant for carjacking, resulting in an increase to the amount of restitution owed, is affirmed where: 1) under a reasonable reading of the relevant rules and case law, the district court's amendment amounted to a clerical revision that did not substantively alter defendant's sentence; and 2) thus, the time limitation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 was… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
Of those proposed rules from 2016 and 2017, four relate to the mortgage industry (proposals relating to mortgage servicing rules and federal mortgage disclosure requirements under Regulation Z, and home mortgage disclosures and technical amendments under Regulation C) and the others relate to prepaid accounts under Regulations E and Z, amendments to the procedures used by the public to obtain information from the CFPB under the Freedom of Information Act,… [read post]
