Search for: "In re: Asbesto Products"
Results 181 - 200
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 9:44 am
The plaintiff claimed 37-year exposure to asbestos-containing products while working for the Illinois Central Railroad. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
What Happened: Thorpe Insulation Company, along with its debtor-affiliate Pacific Insulation Company, distributed, installed, and repaired asbestos insulation products throughout the middle of the twentieth century. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 9:05 pm
., in upcoming asbestos-referral corruption trial of former New York assembly speaker Sheldon Silver [NY Post] Class action procedure: “Big Changes to Rule 23 in 2018? [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:18 am
You’ll just have to settle for our summary.We’re not starting at the beginning. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:46 pm
While that was not the scenario here, it was in In re Related Asbestos Cases (D.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:30 am
The fourth repeat-serious violation involves the lack of an emergency eyewash and training for employees who work with corrosive cleaning products and pool chemicals. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
Courts have to consider the impact of the statute of limitations, res judicata, and the pros and cons of encouraging premature filings relating to the mere risk of future disease or of allowing a plaintiff to, in a sense, split a cause of action into separate claims arising from the same product, same exposure, and same alleged conduct of the defendant. [read post]
17 May 2015, 12:20 pm
Some talc miners and factory workers who use talc have gotten sick from asbestos exposure. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The relevant Utah statute was interpreted in an asbestos products case, in which the defendants asserted that: “the physician who rendered the diagnoses and the technician who administered the pulmonary function tests did so without the required licenses. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Asbestos motion to dismiss granted. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
The many items you’re not allowed to bring into Detroit’s City Hall [Amy Alkon] Tags: asbestos, Detroit, Indian tribes, New York, product liability, prosecution Related posts Update: staking the Shinnecocks (0) Update: Indian sovereignty advances (0) The asbestos litigation machine (2) September 25 roundup (9) September 2001 archives, part 2 (0) [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:40 pm
The Supreme Court also directly referenced the Federal District Court rulings in In re: Related Asbestos Cases 543 F.Supp. 1142, 1151, in which the Court both noted that the defendants might claim that the Navy was a sophisticated user of asbestos products, but that the Plaintiffs might negate the defense by showing that the manufacturers should have known that the Navy would not take proper precautions. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm
The Court of Appeal in O’Neil ruled that defendants could be liable because they could have foreseen that the Navy would use asbestos-containing products in conjunction with the defendants’ products, but the defendants argue (and four California appellate courts have agreed) that they cannot be liable because they did not place the injury-causing asbestos products into the steam of commerce, and merely supplied components that the Navy… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
§ 20701 et seq., preempts state tort lawsuits involving asbestos. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am
For the record – What is MDL 875--Asbestos Products Litigation? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 11:31 am
The companies that used asbestos widely and manufacturers of asbestos-laden products knew of the risks to human health for decades before public health professionals were able to sound the alarm. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Newspaper reports say asbestos continues to be found in sites that had been re-opened, such as a nearby park. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
The second case, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, 2012 U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:31 pm
When asbestos-containing products are cut, drilled, or handled in any way that causes dust, it is extremely dangerous. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:31 pm
When asbestos-containing products are cut, drilled, or handled in any way that causes dust, it is extremely dangerous. [read post]
