Search for: "In re B. S."
Results 181 - 200
of 28,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 5:08 am
As we have fixed certain pieces of functionality, like the account creation process, we’re seeing volume go further down the application. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
In re Gartside,203 F.3d 1305, 1316 (Fed. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Yesterday's COA decision in In In Re: Indiana Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Indianapolis Star, Jeffrey M. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:33 pm
And it was certainly never intended to supplant the Supreme Court's test. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:26 am
You know you're getting older when you can easily answer the Washington Post's Political Trivia Quiz each day. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 2:25 am
The High Court and the Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant’s case stating that the English court had no jurisdiction to determine the Appellant’s 1989 Act application because B had lost her habitual residence immediately upon her removal to Pakistan on 3 February 2014. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
We are discussing the Chancery Court's opinion in In re Loral. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
-Yeni randevu sistemine göre Newark İltica Bürosu (ZNK) dosyaların öncelik sırasını şöyle açıklıyor: ZNK’ya göre dosyalar 4 kategoriye ayrılmış durumda. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
54(3)(b), if the alteration is made effective by an order pursuant to s. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm
In In re Flores, No. 11-55452 (9th Cir. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:15 am
In In re Bigcommerce, No. 2018-120, the court addressed the territorial bounds mapped by the phrase “judicial district” in § 1400(b). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:22 am
§ 41.50(b). [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 12:24 am
I blogged a few times about 10(b) cases raising the question of when shareholders of a publicly traded parent company can sue its wholly-owned subsidiary for the subsidiary’s false statements. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
(We're certainly impressed.) [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 12:00 am
In In re Eaton Corp. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:58 pm
Let's assume Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:07 pm
If you’re hungry for more where that came from, there’s also Lemon Pound Cake… As noted in the comment to the earlier post, I found a link to the text of the complaint. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
If the defendant was sued based on their registered word mark, I think a factfinder in an infringement court would say a survey that has design elements color, font, and so forth when you're asserting the right to use this word in any context, that sort of survey is not going to be as probative as a survey that just uses the word, since you're seeking the right to just use the word.Unfortunately for anyone depending on the SG for guidance,… [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Juvenile law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Malicious burning and destruction of property After a hearing on the merits, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, acting as a juvenile court, found appellant J.B. involved in second degree malicious burning of property, burning a trash receptacle, and malicious destruction of property under $1,000. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Ms M-B applied for re-instatement. [read post]
