Search for: "In re Hubbell"
Results 181 - 200
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2013, 3:00 am
In re Jeffrey Hubbell: An Inventor Changing Jobs Creates Double Patenting ProblemHubbell argued that obviousness-type double patenting is not appropriate where the application and the conflicting claim (1) share common inventors but do not have identical inventive entities, (2) were never commonly owned, and (3) are not subject to a joint research agreement. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Please re-number footnote 1 on page 7, line 28, as footnote2. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:45 am
The Patent Office countered that: (1) whether the application and patent were ever commonly owned is immaterial to the policy of preventing harassment by multiple assignees; (2) identity of inventorship is not required where there is an overlap in inventors; (3) Hubbell did not establish any grounds for being allowed to file a terminal disclaimer; and (4) two-way obviousness analysis is not required because Hubbell admitted that he partially is responsible for the delay that caused… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:58 pm
The "Hubbell" in In re Hubbell is Jeffrey Hubbell, who was a Professor of ChemicalEngineering at California Institute of Technology, who is a named inventor on U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:59 pm
The named inventors on the '509 application are Jeffrey Hubbell, Jason... [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:35 pm
A comparable description re such US law is found with no other business law firm of this kind and size on a nationwide level. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 9:21 am
So if you’re not there – if you are not effectively marketing your legal services -- you simply do not exist to prospects looking for a lawyer. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:22 am
Helping lawyers re-write their bios is one of the most interesting and satisfying things I do in this job. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:05 am
When a lawyer is rated AV by Martindale-Hubbell, the rating remains for the rest of his career. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:29 am
You're under no obligation to hire the lawyer with whom you correspond, and you may learn enough to decide to interview that lawyer.Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 11:48 am
Check for peer reviews and client feedback on law review websites like Martindale-Hubbell and Avvo. 6. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
And it adds a new comment to Model Rule 7.2 to address marketing methods like Total Attorneys, Martindale-Hubbell’s Lawyers.com and even, yes, Groupon. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
We could swear that we once saw a TV lawyer look up a point of law by retrieving a volume of Martindale-Hubbell from a shelf. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
And it adds a new comment to Model Rule 7.2 to address marketing methods like Total Attorneys, Martindale-Hubbell’s Lawyers.com and even, yes, Groupon. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Bonus product demonstrations include Lawyers.comSM, Martindale-Hubbell®, PC Law®, Juris®, Time Matters®, Lexis Advance™, Lexis® for Microsoft® Office and more. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:16 pm
Newspapers and legal publishers like Martindale-Hubbell, ironically a Reed Elsevier Company. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Bonus product demonstrations include Lawyers.comSM, Martindale-Hubbell®, PC Law®, Juris®, Time Matters®, Lexis Advance™, Lexis® for Microsoft® Office and more. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
The Law Offices of David Michael Cantor is AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
Now all you need to do is flip open the cover of your iPad and you’re ready to go! [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:15 am
You’re welcome. [read post]
