Search for: "In re John Robert Large" Results 181 - 200 of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 11:27 am by Amy Howe
And any traction that the two justices might have temporarily gained from their line of questions seemed to vanish when Chief Justice John Roberts asked Tulumello whether that issue was actually even before the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 10:22 am
They are—in large measure—themselves superannuated. [read post]
14 May 2009, 8:26 am
" Representatives Henry Waxman, Edward Markey (D-MA), John Dingell (D-MI), Rick Boucher (D-VA), Bart Gordon (D-TN), and Mike Doyle (D-PA) released the details of the agreement on a Combined Efficiency and RES. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am by Ronald Collins
Sebelius (2012), in which Chief Justice John Roberts transmogrified Obamacare’s individual mandate penalty into a tax. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Justice Elena Kagan briefly raised questions about the clarity of this interpretation, but Roberts applied something like res judicata to historical interpretation: “The dissent, for its part, largely reprises points that the Court has already considered and rejected,” such as “downplay[ing] the decision of 1789. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
So far, only two of those precedents have been (de facto) overruled -- but they're big ones: Carhart and the BCRA title II section of McConnell. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 9:08 am
They're also old enough to have vast networks of contacts that Howrey can now ply for recruits and clients. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:13 am by Jackie McDermott
That does not mean we're going to be reaching out and calling and witnesses who the House didn't see fit to call in the first instance. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 3:31 am
"When do we stop paying our tax money for something we're getting nothing for? [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:32 am by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., had supposedly made in the health care decision. [read post]
” With respect to the other mandate, the mandate for federally-funded healthcare centers, the court by a 5-4 majority – with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh in the majority for both, so they sort of switched their votes to the administration in the second case – the court said 5-4, yes, CMS is allowed to issue this rule, and federally-funded healthcare centers must require their employees to be vaccinated. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm by Ronald Mann
Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, referred to a provision capping the size of permitted bingo games at $100, and suggested that “if you told somebody that they have games up to $1,000, it would be perfectly natural for that person to say, well, that’s ‘prohibited’ because there’s a $100 cap. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:51 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Eleventh Circuit because, in Chief Justice John Roberts’s words, “[t]his dispute is still very much alive. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:21 am by Tony Mauro
 Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. smiled as he granted the father's motion, adding a rare personal note. [read post]