Search for: "In re L.J.-1 and L.J.-2" Results 181 - 200 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
[Note 2: Louisiana HB 142 requires sites containing 1/3 porn to verify age. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
We're in litigation - not regulatory. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
” Id. at 711-12 (citing Steven Gold, “Causation in Toxic Torts: Burdens of Proof, Standards of Persuasion, and Statistical Evidence,” 96 Yale L.J. 376, 384, 390 (1986). [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
  Of course, we lambastedthe Karl decision ourselves (and made Karl #1 in our inaugural worst decisions of the year post). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
The recently closed Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) investigation of Google, Inc. for alleged monopolization[1] illustrates a truism of antitrust practice. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm by Bill Marler
[2]           Not all E. coli are motile. [read post]