Search for: "In re S. Cooper III, amended" Results 181 - 200 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
Even though we’re tightening components of the OVDP, we still believe it’s a better deal than the alternative, because if we find you, you will face higher penalties and, as the record shows, could face criminal prosecution and jail time. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States, because its judges do not enjoy the protections of Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 And so, here's a post devoted to catching up, in three parts. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:13 am by Shannon O'Hare
  French law relating to security interests is also expected to be amended this year. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:59 am by Kevin Jon Heller
Sunday’s release showed a growing willingness on the part of WikiLeaks, whose founder, Julian Assange, is facing rape charges in Sweden, to cooperate with the government on the document trove. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE III When the offense has been committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the requesting Party, extradition need not be granted unless the laws of the requested Party provide for the punishment of such an offense committed in similar circumstances. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
We’re here to overthrow it completely. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
  In re Xerox Corp Securities Litig., 746 F.Supp. 2d 402, 414-15 (D. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm by Lucy Reed
This is not least because of subsequent amendments of both primary and secondary legislation, for example: through the implementation of s 119 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (the 2003 Act) relating to the admissibility of previous inconsistent statements as evidence in criminal proceedings, and the relaxation of the rules on disclosure begun by the amendment in 2005 of the (then) Family Proceedings Rules 1991, which permitted automatic disclosure of information to the… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm by Larry Catá Backer
    The second session was chaired by Professor Gu Mionkang, School of Law, CUHK, and included papers by the following scholars:Prof Jianfu Chen (School of Law, La Trobe University, Australia) That’s Capitalism, but are there any Chinese characteristics? [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Instead of leaving all assets to the surviving spouse and thereby exposing the surviving spouse’s estate to more tax, Nursing Home & Medicaid issues, plus elective share by a future spouse, both spouse’s Wills are drafted to establish a Credit Shelter Trust to come into existence and be funded on the first spouse’s death. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:29 pm by David Doniger
  The bill would amend the Clean Air Act to establish steadily declining limits on carbon emission from the major sectors responsible for America’s carbon pollution, including electricity production, heavy industry, and transportation. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 10:28 am by Russell Knight
” 325 ILCS 5/7.4 “If the family refuses to cooperate or refuses access to the home or children, then a child protective services investigation shall be initiated” 325 ILCS 5/7.01 If you don’t cooperate with DCFS, a formal DCFS investigation will begin with all of the possible consequences. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
 Information about the Seminar series follows below along with  Ckaire Methven O'Brien's quite useful: A business and human rights framework treaty: Information note. [read post]
Petitioners challenged the County’s approval of the revival of a non-operational water bottling plant for beverage production, arguing the County violated CEQA by (i) providing an inaccurate project description, (ii) relying on impermissible narrow project objectives, (iii) improperly evaluated several project impacts, and (iv) approved a project inconsistent with the County’s general plan. [read post]