Search for: "In re S. Cooper III, amended"
Results 181 - 200
of 271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
Even though we’re tightening components of the OVDP, we still believe it’s a better deal than the alternative, because if we find you, you will face higher penalties and, as the record shows, could face criminal prosecution and jail time. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Asarco LLC, 135 S. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States, because its judges do not enjoy the protections of Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
Beach, S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
And so, here's a post devoted to catching up, in three parts. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
III. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:13 am
French law relating to security interests is also expected to be amended this year. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:59 am
Sunday’s release showed a growing willingness on the part of WikiLeaks, whose founder, Julian Assange, is facing rape charges in Sweden, to cooperate with the government on the document trove. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE III When the offense has been committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the requesting Party, extradition need not be granted unless the laws of the requested Party provide for the punishment of such an offense committed in similar circumstances. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
We’re here to overthrow it completely. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
In re Xerox Corp Securities Litig., 746 F.Supp. 2d 402, 414-15 (D. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
This is not least because of subsequent amendments of both primary and secondary legislation, for example: through the implementation of s 119 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (the 2003 Act) relating to the admissibility of previous inconsistent statements as evidence in criminal proceedings, and the relaxation of the rules on disclosure begun by the amendment in 2005 of the (then) Family Proceedings Rules 1991, which permitted automatic disclosure of information to the… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm
The second session was chaired by Professor Gu Mionkang, School of Law, CUHK, and included papers by the following scholars:Prof Jianfu Chen (School of Law, La Trobe University, Australia) That’s Capitalism, but are there any Chinese characteristics? [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm
Instead of leaving all assets to the surviving spouse and thereby exposing the surviving spouse’s estate to more tax, Nursing Home & Medicaid issues, plus elective share by a future spouse, both spouse’s Wills are drafted to establish a Credit Shelter Trust to come into existence and be funded on the first spouse’s death. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
But Not Everyone Thinks They’re Broken. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:29 pm
The bill would amend the Clean Air Act to establish steadily declining limits on carbon emission from the major sectors responsible for America’s carbon pollution, including electricity production, heavy industry, and transportation. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 10:28 am
” 325 ILCS 5/7.4 “If the family refuses to cooperate or refuses access to the home or children, then a child protective services investigation shall be initiated” 325 ILCS 5/7.01 If you don’t cooperate with DCFS, a formal DCFS investigation will begin with all of the possible consequences. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Beaupère-Manokha, acting as Agents,– the Italian Government, by G. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
Information about the Seminar series follows below along with Ckaire Methven O'Brien's quite useful: A business and human rights framework treaty: Information note. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Petitioners challenged the County’s approval of the revival of a non-operational water bottling plant for beverage production, arguing the County violated CEQA by (i) providing an inaccurate project description, (ii) relying on impermissible narrow project objectives, (iii) improperly evaluated several project impacts, and (iv) approved a project inconsistent with the County’s general plan. [read post]