Search for: "In re STATE QUESTION NO. 241"
Results 181 - 200
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 12:04 pm
Small Employer Family Leave Mediation Pilot Program: AB 1033 is a re-run bill that would attempt again to establish pilot program for a small employer family leave med [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The Bottom Line: “Barrett filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(6). [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Because an agreement on which an account stated claim is based can be express or implied, a creditor need not produce a written contract to establish the agreement between the parties; an implied agreement can arise from the acts and conduct of the parties. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Whether an invention would have been obvious at the time it was made is a question of law, which we review de novo, based on underlying facts, which we review for clear error. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
United States, 116 U. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
********************** Introduction Securities class actions that reach verdict are rare, but these rare events provide valuable insights for negotiating the roughly half of all cases that result in settlement.[1] This article describes techniques for minimizing class damages following a judgment for plaintiffs, focusing upon two recent trial victories by plaintiffs, namely In re Vivendi Universal Sec. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The course in question covered the history of Western legal thought and philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Hobbes, and Mill. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 1993); In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Hence the question regarding the degree of proof of non-access for rebutting the conclusiveness must be answered in the light of what is meant by access or non-access as delineated above. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
“Given the proliferation of consumer filtering and choice, these kinds of interventions are of questionable efficacy. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
The Committee relied on its standard 4A-criteria: Availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability.[6] Functioning institutions and programs must be available in the state, but also physically and economically accessible for all—without discrimination in law or in fact. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
What legal analysis provides the answer to these questions? [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
The question should be asked, has any published correspondence dealt with these paper, and what do other papers that cite them say about them? [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
There was no dispute whether or not the conduct in question came within the permitted purposes now that “education” had been added by the Copyright Modernization Act. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
These are some of the questions which we would endeavour to answer in this judgment.33. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
