Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support" Results 181 - 200 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2015, 10:35 am by Jon McLaughlin
Springfield lawyer Howard Feldman, appointed to the committee by the Illinois Supreme Court, said that assigning responsibility that way avoids creating winners and losers in a process that often leads to conflict. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:11 am by Steve Minor
Rogers, which deals with the right to counsel in cases against parents who are hailed into to court in civil contempt cases for failure to pay child support. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
But this is a room that could be reasonably used by anyone under Reg B13 (5): a. a couple (within the meaning of Part 7 of the Act); b. a person who is not a child; ba. a child who cannot share a bedroom; c. two children of the same sex; d. two children who are less than 10 years old; e. a child. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:10 am by SHG
  Indeed, judges have always noted that they’re supported by police unions. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:16 am by SHG
The child that Hasan gave birth to in prison was nearly an adult. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” “Your state is battling us tooth and nail and we are now in the Supreme Court over whether it’s kosher for me to issue a child support order for a tribal child. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:16 am by Daniel Richardson
By David RangavizIn re K.F., 2013 VT 39Family law cases are almost invariably heartwrenching. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
Federal Election Commission12-683Issue: When appellant wishes to take funds that may be legally contributed to political action committees and party committees, and instead contribute those same funds directly to additional candidate committees, whether the three-judge district court erred in dismissing her facial and as-applied challenge to Section 307(b) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am by Daniel E. Cummins
It is also noted on this issue that, in early 2011, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Civil Procedural Rules Committee published a draft of its Proposed Recommendation No. 248, seeking to amend Pa.R.C.P. 4003.5, which pertains to expert discovery. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm by Schachtman
Given the number of members of the Committee, their diverse backgrounds and political views, it is difficult to see how Ortho could have biased the Committee’s consideration of the issues; yet the plaintiffs’ witnesses made sweeping, subjective, and defamatory statements, which the trial court credited. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The First Amendment has featured in several Supreme Court decisions given since our last round-up in late April, but generally on their periphery rather than front and centre. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:48 am by Sex Offender Issues
SORNA is part of the 2006 Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, which made it a federal crime for a registered sex offender to move to another state without re-registering with that new home state. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
(In Germany you get generous benefits for one year, then basic support forever.) [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:45 am
Full report: Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:58 pm
Scottish adoption law compatible with human right to family lifeA discussion of the Supreme Court judgment in ANS v ML [2012] UKSC 30. [read post]