Search for: "Intellectual Ventures, LLC"
Results 181 - 200
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Supp. 3d at 659–62;Intellectual Ventures I LLC, v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
There are, however, also issues concerning intellectual property rights and freedom of movement, which are considered in a blog post from Fieldfisher. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:52 pm
In marked contrast to its other administrative law decision today (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
May 17, 2016) and in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v.Capital One Bank (USA), 792 F.3d 1363, 1367 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
May 17, 2016) and in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v.Capital One Bank (USA), 792 F.3d 1363, 1367 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:45 pm
In addition, to an individual, a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, LLC, trust, estate, joint venture or joint applicants may be the proper legal owner of a trademark. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:45 pm
In addition, to an individual, a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, LLC, trust, estate, joint venture or joint applicants may be the proper legal owner of a trademark. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:16 am
" Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 3:38 am
This is not a business venture. [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:38 pm
Directory Assistance Call Completion Is Not A Financial Service for CBM Purposes By Joseph Herndon -- On May 4, 2016, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a decision denying institution of a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review in a proceeding between AT&T Mobility and Intellectual Ventures, based on U.S. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:32 am
Intellectual Ventures I, 792 F.3d at1371 (because the patent claims at issue did not “addressproblems unique to the Internet, . . . [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm
After Multiple CBM Petitions, Motorola Invalidates Software Patent By Joseph Herndon -- On March 21, 2016, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a final written decision in the Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review between Motorola Mobility, LLC and Intellectual Ventures I, LLC, in which challenged claims were found to be unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
" Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:19 am
Stark in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:19 am
Stark in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Aegis Defense Services, LLC, 976 F. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 8:48 am
Patent No. 7,634,666 of Intellectual Ventures II LLC. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
The UK Intellectual Property Office launched a consultation prior to drafting this SI, as reported by the IPKat here. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
Here is the list: Abundance Partners, Andreessen Horowitz, Baseline Ventures, Benchmark, Betaworks, Brand Foundry, Bullet Time Ventures, Capital, Freshtracks Capital, Claremont Creek Ventures, Collaborative Fund, CommonAngels Ventures, DBL Investors, Emerson Collective, First Round Capital, Forerunner Ventures, Formation|8, Founders Fund, Foundry Group, Generation Equity Investors, Good Capital, Greycroft Partners, Hallett Capital, Harrison… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
* Diamonds are forever, but joint ventures are more fragile: court helps exorcise ghost of business failureKatfriend and occasional contributor Kevin Winters, pointing to a recent Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, a decision of Judge Hacon in Helme & Others v Maher & Another [2015] EWHC 3151 (IPEC) on a copyright infringement resulted from a business relationship that has gone sour. [read post]
