Search for: "Interest of S.B." Results 181 - 200 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 7:31 pm by Hayley Tsukayama
Tomorrow, the Privacy Committee will instead vote on several bills backed by Big Tech interests that will erode the CCPA and the promises this law made to give all Californians the privacy rights they want and deserve. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by Ernesto Falcon
A.B. 1366 would instead wash the state’s hands of trying to promote competition under the premise that monopolists have the best interest of consumers in mind. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:34 pm by Adam Schwartz
In essence, if everyone has the power to protect their own privacy, then special interests will have a harder time using their influence to shield themselves from accountability. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:07 am by Katharine Trendacosta
A net neutrality bill, S.B. 822 was introduced the very first day of the California legislative session. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Enhancing the Role of Public Interest Organizations in Rulemaking via Pre-Notice Transparency is cited in the following article: Kathryn E. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:20 am by Nassiri Law
But this doesn’t mean you shouldn’t speak to a wage theft attorney who will be solely interested in representing your rights. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
S.B. 224 also makes it an unlawful practice to deny or aid, incite, or conspire in the denial of rights of persons relating to sexual harassment. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Larry Nassar and his hundreds of victims.The USOC has been roundly criticized for putting children’s interests second to medals and money. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
” Court dismisses most of Trump Administration’s challenges to California state immigration laws After concluding that the Trump Administration is not likely to succeed on the merits of its Supremacy Clause claims against two California immigration-related laws (S.B. 54 and A.B. 103) and the notice requirement provision of a third (A.B. 450), a federal district court in California has granted the state’s motion to dismiss those claims. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
Aside from resolving over 2,000 pending cases, Judge Johnson’s judgment was of intense interest to all who are involved in pharmaceutical and other products liability litigation. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
KG=s claim of parental standing was predicated upon the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
KG=s claim of parental standing was predicated upon the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]
While consumer groups including the Consumer Attorneys of California, the California Public Interest Research Group, and others have come out in support, business organizations are, strongly opposed to the bill. [read post]
While consumer groups including the Consumer Attorneys of California, the California Public Interest Research Group, and others have come out in support, business organizations are, strongly opposed to the bill. [read post]