Search for: "J.B., Matter of" Results 181 - 200 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
Christine Leigh Baker n/k/a Christine Leigh Weitzenfeld (NFP) - "William Baker ("Father") appeals from an order granting guardianship of Father's children, A.B. and J.B. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
So the timelines provided for by the state constitution are already by the boards no matter what, which would leave a state court without much of a basis for creating a commission that already violates the prescribed timeline for it to act. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
The Board of Trustees of Vincennes University (NFP) In the Matter of S.R., Tamela R. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:50 am by Eugene Volokh
And of a piece was the Appeals Officer's failure even to acknowledge the importance of [proposed newly discovered witness] J.B.'s statement as impeachment evidence regarding Roe's claims. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:48 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Quinney College of Law, University of Utah - Accommodating Miracles Jonathan Will, Mississippi College School of Law - Religion as a Controlling Interference that Prevents Autonomous Choice in Medical Decision Making by Minors Attempting to Utilize the Common Law Mature Minor Doctrine Matthew J.B. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Tippecanoe County Department of Child Services (NFP) J.B. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 2:00 am by Kelly Fitzsimmons
The advent of autonomous trucks is being touted as a win-win across the board. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
A patent is invalid for obviousness "if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am by Bexis
  The main theory that the plaintiffs were able to come up with involved that last-refuge-of-a-scoundrel Restatement section, §324A “Good Samaritan” liability, that would have:  (1) required publishers to investigate the substantive validity of everything they publish (the Philadelphia case involved clinical trials), and (2) would have placed anyone who published anything about a drug, no matter how limited, under a duty to research and publish everything. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
" The Matter of Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of E.M. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Omegle * To No One’s Surprise, FOSTA Is Confounding Judges–J.B. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Court Debates Using Shell Companies to Mask Political Donations Bloomberg Law – Kenneth Doyle | Published: 1/10/2020 A federal appeals court panel heard arguments over the use of shell companies to hide donations in a case that could affect super PAC disclosure in the 2020 election. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]