Search for: "JONES v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 181 - 200
of 222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
The government appealed that ruling. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
In the case of Maras v Lesses ([2016] SADC 40) the District Court of South Australia awarded damages of Aus$75,000 to a member of the Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia against another member of the community in respect of a defamatory flyer, newsletter and email. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
At the time this wasn’t a serious problem in the District of Columbia but with the expansion of government employment during and after World War I (and the extension of the federal pension system), it became one as a really large proportion of the District’s population was disqualified. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We blogged about the problems with Guinan here.District of ColumbiaThe very first court to permit medical monitoring absent actual injury was a federal "prediction" of District of Columbia law. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
In a nutshell, you cannot sue a government agency or a school district, unless it’s done within a certain period of time after suffering an injury or loss. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
New South Wales District Court Judge Judith Gibson argues the case for reform in a paper she delivered on 29 November 2010 to the Intellectual Property, Media and Communications Law Roundtable held at UTS. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Tatel, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and Steven R. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
The district court rejected the motion. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
This hack led to a putative class action complaint being filed against OPM and others in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in late June, 2015.[6] As in the customer cases discussed above, the gravamen of the employee complaint against OPM is inaction. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Jones and Jon B. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
HILL, Jr., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.No. 05-13-01634-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.Opinion Filed January 26, 2016.773*773 On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
Four state legislatures, plus the District of Columbia, and one state court have successfully taken the step, with more likely to follow. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
