Search for: "James v. Scott" Results 181 - 200 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
The essential insight of the pragmatists – whether Peirce, William James or John Dewey – was their recognition of the value of the subjective aspects of human experience. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
To justify the removal of Taney’s bust, the bill declares that: While sitting in the United States Capitol, the Supreme Court issued the infamous Dred Scott v Sanford decision on March 6, 1857. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
Mitchell was convicted of capital murder for the Jan. 27, 2017, robbery and fatal shooting of Khrystophir Scott, who was a customer in the Quik Sak Store in White Settlement when Mitchell attempted to rob it. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Additional commentary comes from Scott Cosenza at Liberty Nation and Caroline Mala Corbin at Take Care. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Scott Skinner-Thompson and Kate Levine argue that even after Bostock v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
James Horgan, a former President of IP Federation and assistant managing counsel at Merck Sharp & Dohme, commented that the IP Federation is "better value than any commercial organization. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Take The Partisan Republic’s closing vignette of Dred Scott. [read post]