Search for: "John Doe 1-X" Results 181 - 200 of 655
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews the likely relists. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:04 pm by Charnovitz
  Although some analysts have argued that Trump does not have legal authority to pull the US out, I believe that the President does have that authority. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
Importantly, my paper also provides the theoretical basis to understand why executive privilege does not apply to impeachment. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[x] But the argument is not as compelling as it once was. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:32 pm by Mitu Gulati
and the fact that the best predictor of the definition used in contract X is what definition was used in the immediately prior contract X-1 (so, these contracts are sticky? [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Realising that the professionals in the case would be bound by their respect for X’s privacy, the mother has utilised this t [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The ICPC=s provisions are to be Aliberally construed to effectuate the purposes thereof@(Social Services Law ' 374Ba, Article X). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:25 am by Rob Robinson
John Doe’s employer downloads the dataset and finds one (and only one) record matching Doe’s information: male living in Berkeley, CA (94720), born on January 2nd, 1968, and diagnosed with breast cancer (self-disclosed by John Doe). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
., Service X removes 40% of anti-vaxxer content and Service Y removes 45% of anti-vaxxer content. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am by Andrew Patterson
In Matter of M-S-, Attorney General Barr overruled Matter of X-K-, relying on INA § 235(b)(1)(B)(ii), which provides that a person who establishes a credible fear of persecution “shall be detained for further consideration of the application for asylum. [read post]