Search for: "Justice v. State Compensation Director"
Results 181 - 200
of 673
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Weiss v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
The practice suggests the way that private, market and harm based civil action may be used to supplement or compensate for failures of criminal law within states (Cf., here). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm
Since 2013, no shareholders have used this as a mechanism to seek compensation. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The dissenting Justice argued that the liquidated damages provision, which established the holdover rent at 150 percent of base rent, was an unenforceable penalty. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In July 2020, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm
The lawsuits typically seek a variety of remedial measures, including the addition of African American directors to the companies’ boards; the creation of a fund to promote diversity and inclusion in the defendant company’s workforce; the setting of minority hiring goals, with executive compensation tied to achievement of the objectives; and institution of periodic board diversity training. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The dissenting Justice argued that the liquidated damages provision, which established the holdover rent at 150 percent of base rent, was an unenforceable penalty. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:27 am
v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:42 am
Decisions this Week The Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Amnesty International & Ors v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The dissenting Justice argued that the liquidated damages provision, which established the holdover rent at 150 percent of base rent, was an unenforceable penalty. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Criminal LiabilityCorporations and their directors and employees are exposed to criminally liable for violating statutory laws and regulations.E. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In Bliss v. [read post]
Del. high court says undisclosed post-merger role made Tower CEO self-interested, board ill informed
12 Jul 2020, 5:40 pm
July 25, 2019) The majority of the en banc court said at the motion-to-dismiss stage, the undisclosed prospect of a post-merger CEO job with a five-fold pay increase for Towers’ lead negotiator would have been a conflict-of-interest concern if revealed to his board – especially since Haley subsequently supported a minimum price increase , Justice Karen Valihura, writing for the majority, said the high court’s standard for a duty of candor charge, stated in… [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonia Sotomayor indicated that they would have granted hearing the case. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Angell v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am
The views of LSO’s Treasurer, Malcolm Mercer, as expressed in his comment to my Slaw article of July 25, 2019, “Law Society Policy for Access to Justice Failure,” are much more compatible with the interests of the first group than those of the second group, i.e., incompatible with what LSO’s recently approved Strategic Plan states and is capable of. [read post]
