Search for: "KAISER v. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:06 am by Walton Law Firm
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, this case “raises the issue of whether Medicaid beneficiaries can seek relief in federal court when they believe their rights are being violated by state officials, or whether enforcement of state compliance with federal Medicaid rules should be left solely to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:06 am by Walton Law Firm
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, this case “raises the issue of whether Medicaid beneficiaries can seek relief in federal court when they believe their rights are being violated by state officials, or whether enforcement of state compliance with federal Medicaid rules should be left solely to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:10 am by Matt Kaiser
United States, Matt Kaiser, Ninth Circuit, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Bar, Tax Law [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Carter, 68 AD3d 750 [2d Dept 20091; Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 63 AD3d 153[4th Dept]], rearg. denied, 66 AD3d 1.50 [2009]). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Fisher 36 AD3d 486 (1 Dept 2007), but see, Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern,LLP, 63 AD3d 1531 [4th Dept 2009); Izko Sportswear CQ,. [read post]