Search for: "LITTLE v. HOLDER" Results 181 - 200 of 1,864
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
’ Helmers and Love seek to maximize scope of what is deemed opportunistic to include virtually any action an SEP holder might pursue in its legitimate attempts to obtain FRAND licensing. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
How should we think about the disadvantage that holders of idiosyncratic beliefs face under P2? [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
What I'm suggesting is that there is no judicial remedy and for reasons broadly similar to the reasons why the Supreme Court found in Nixon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
In Tradesman Program Managers, LLC v Doyle, decided earlier this month by the Appellate Division, First Department, the court affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley rejecting the tax estoppel argument made by the putative holder (JCB) of an 18.75% membership interest in an LLC. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 12:10 pm by Heather Douglas
 In the recent decision, Cicada 137 LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  The first holder of that office was William MacCracken, a 1911 graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, who had served as a flight trainer during World War I, had chaired the American Bar Association’s Committee on the Law of Aeronautics since its creation in 1920, and helped draft the Air Commerce Act after studying European air ministries. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:38 am by admin
Unlike the advertising of tobacco and vaping products, there exists relatively little guidance from Health Canada and other regulators following the enactment of the Cannabis Act to help interpret cannabis laws. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
 Beyond all of that, as my colleague David Hasen, who also teaches tax law at the Univesity of Florida, pointed out in an email:"There are plenty of exceptions to the realization requirement already, including for dealers in securities, holders of certain financial contracts, holders of off-shore investment funds and certain income of controlled foreign corporations. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Little has changed since Judge Posner's assessment. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In what amounts to an interest-free loan from the rest of us to large property holders, rich people under current law can see their fortunes rise, but so long as they do not sell their shares for cash, they never have to pay tax. [read post]