Search for: "LITTLE v. HOLDER" Results 181 - 200 of 1,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
But little from the legislation has yet made it through the upper chamber. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
It's very shortsighted on some app developers' part to bet on overreaching interpretations of decisions--be it Judge YGR's "consolation prize" injunction in Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
’ Helmers and Love seek to maximize scope of what is deemed opportunistic to include virtually any action an SEP holder might pursue in its legitimate attempts to obtain FRAND licensing. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
How should we think about the disadvantage that holders of idiosyncratic beliefs face under P2? [read post]